System and method for evaluating the energy use of multiple different building massing configurations

ABSTRACT

Computer based methods and systems for characterizing the energy use of multiple different building massing configurations are disclosed. In one embodiment, a computer based method involves specifying a set of parameters for a building massing configuration, calculating a normalized energy use index for multiple different building massing configurations that meet the specified set of parameters, wherein the normalized energy use index for each of the multiple different building massing configurations is normalized against a reference energy use index of a reference building, ranking the multiple different building massing configurations by the respective normalized energy use indexes, and selecting at least one of the different massing configurations for display on a graphical user interface according to the ranking.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser.No. 13/424,233, filed Mar. 19, 2012, which is entitled to the benefit ofprovisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/453,867, filed Mar. 17,2011, entitled “Method and system to plan, design, construct and deploybuildings,” both of which are incorporated by reference herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates generally to buildings, and, more specifically tocomputer-based techniques for evaluating the energy demand of differentbuilding massing options.

BACKGROUND

Buildings are an integral part of our everyday lives. The process ofplanning, designing and constructing these buildings has evolved overseveral thousands of years. Today, especially for modern facilities thatare places from which to deliver complex services (like healthcarefacilities), the steps followed to physically realize such buildings arevery complicated and require a high degree of skilled labor that spansseveral different disciplines.

This complexity poses a huge challenge in terms of time, money and otherresources expended in order to build a viable facility that can be usedto deliver the intended services in an efficient and profitable way.Several industries and services have met similar complexity challengesby changing their work flow and adapting it to better exploit fastgrowing and inexpensive computational resources. This has resulted in anincreased productivity in those industries.

However, the emergence of technological and computational capabilitieshas found limited adoption in the well established processes of buildingdesign and construction. As a result, there has been little gain inoverall productivity, which is desperately needed today to meet thegrowing demand in complexity. For example, it has been found that whileall other non-farming industries have doubled their productivity from1964 to 2004, the building industry brethren have actually fallenbehind.

While a plethora of reasons exist as to why construction productivityhas not kept up with other areas, it is possible that conventionalmethods used in the building design and construction industry are notamenable to applying technology in general and computational technologyin particular. Almost all other industries have gained in productivitydue to the smart adaptation of computing technology, but, for reasonsnot immediately apparent, the construction industry has not seen anysimilar gains.

Buildings come in all different shapes and sizes and the complexity ofbuildings varies depending on their use. For example, from manydifferent perspectives, a healthcare building such as a hospital is muchmore complex than an empty warehouse building. The complexity of abuilding becomes apparent when one tries to mathematically describe,model, simulate, optimize, and verify a building design such as thedesign of a hospital. In particular, the mathematical description,modeling, simulation, optimization, and verification are each a complexcombination of three dimensional (3D) space and temporal operations.Characteristics of the 3D space include, for example, specifics of thebuilding shell and core, the size and layout and function of the rooms,and routing of the building infrastructure. Characteristics of thetemporal operations include, for example, the services provided withinthe building, load on the building (e.g., volume of patients), anddynamic environmental conditions (e.g., internal/external temperature,light, energy cost, etc).

SUMMARY

In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a computer basedmethod for characterizing the energy use of multiple different buildingmassing configurations is disclosed. The computer based method involvesspecifying a set of parameters for a building massing configuration,calculating a normalized energy use index for multiple differentbuilding massing configurations that meet the specified set ofparameters, wherein the normalized energy use index for each of themultiple different building massing configurations is normalized againsta reference energy use index of a reference building, ranking themultiple different building massing configurations by the respectivenormalized energy use indexes, and selecting at least one of thedifferent massing configurations for display on a graphical userinterface according to the ranking.

Other aspects and advantages of embodiments of the present inventionwill become apparent from the following detailed description, taken inconjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrated by way ofexample of the principles of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a holistic building management system that utilizeshigh performance and high productivity computing resources to implementa building realization platform that takes a building project frominception to building operation.

FIG. 2 depicts an embodiment of a high-productivity high-performancecomputer architecture in which a building realization platform can beimplemented.

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a parallel hierarchical designtechnique that is implemented using the building realization platform.

FIG. 4 depicts an embodiment of a user interface of the buildingrealization platform that includes selectable tabs for activatingrealization engines of the building realization platform.

FIG. 5 depicts an embodiment of a user interface from the business modeldomain of the building realization platform.

FIG. 6 depicts another embodiment of a user interface from the businessmodel domain of the building realization platform.

FIG. 7 depicts an embodiment of a user interface from the form and shelltab in the spatial arrangement domain of the building realizationplatform.

FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of a user interface from the block andstack tab of the spatial arrangement domain of the building realizationplatform.

FIGS. 9 and 10 depict user interfaces from the room placement tab of thespatial arrangement domain of the building realization platform.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of a unified data model that is used bythe building realization platform.

FIG. 12 is a process flow diagram of a computer-based technique forgenerating a systems integration design from a set of customer needs.

FIG. 13 illustrates system elements and a corresponding process flow forgenerating a spatial arrangement from a business model using thebuilding realization platform.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment of the architecture of an embodimentof the building realization platform.

FIG. 15 illustrates the execution of a service that is provided by oneof the realization engines.

FIG. 16 is a process flow diagram of a method for realizing a complexbuilding system.

FIG. 17 is a process flow diagram of a method for realizing a buildingsystem within which healthcare services will be provided to patients.

FIG. 18 depicts a computer that includes a processor, memory, and acommunications interface.

FIGS. 19 a-19 i depict nine different predefined building footprintshapes.

FIG. 20 depicts the footprint shape of a reference building.

FIG. 21 illustrates an embodiment of a process for calculating theenergy use index, EUI, of the reference building.

FIG. 22 illustrates an embodiment of a process for generating normalizedenergy use indexes, nEUIs, for buildings having the footprint shape R.

FIG. 23 illustrates an embodiment of a process for generating normalizedenergy use indexes for buildings having the footprint shape L.

FIG. 24 illustrates an embodiment of a normalized energy use indexderivation operation, which includes shape-specific nEUI databases, anormalized energy use index formula derivation engine, andshape-specific nEUI formula databases.

FIG. 25 illustrates an embodiment of a process for using shape-specificformulas to characterize the energy use of multiple different buildingmassing configurations early on in the building design process.

FIGS. 26-28 depict graphical user interfaces related to a technique forcharacterizing the energy use of multiple different building massingconfigurations using the massing configuration evaluator of FIG. 25.

FIG. 29 illustrates a process for generating building massingconfiguration primitives from a base solid mass and the application ofat least one void object according to a shape grammar.

FIG. 30 depicts a graphical user interface that graphically displaysbuilding massing configurations for a rectangle footprint shape.

FIG. 31 depicts a graphical user interface of entries in a buildingalphabet database that is generated using the shape grammar as describedwith reference to FIG. 29.

FIG. 32 depicts a graphical user interface of a search window thatallows certain parameters of a search to be specified.

FIG. 33 illustrates the application of shape grammar to the buildingalphabet to form more complex building massing configurations.

FIG. 34 depicts a graphical user interface that graphically displaysbuilding words that are formed by combining different primitives of thebuilding alphabet.

FIG. 35 depicts a graphical user interface of different building massingconfigurations that are formed by a combination of the building letters.

FIG. 36 illustrates the application of shape grammar to a set ofbuilding words to generate building sentences.

FIG. 37 depicts an embodiment of a system for implementing the buildingmassing configuration generation and management techniques as describedabove.

Throughout the description, similar reference numbers may be used toidentify similar elements. Additionally, in some cases, referencenumbers are not repeated in each figure in order to preserve the clarityand avoid cluttering of the figures.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It will be readily understood that the components of the embodiments asgenerally described herein and illustrated in the appended figures couldbe arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations.Thus, the following more detailed description of various embodiments, asrepresented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of thepresent disclosure, but is merely representative of various embodiments.While the various aspects of the embodiments are presented in drawings,the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale unless specificallyindicated.

The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only asillustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is,therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by this detaileddescription. All changes which come within the meaning and range ofequivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

Reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, orsimilar language does not imply that all of the features and advantagesthat may be realized with the present invention should be or are in anysingle embodiment. Rather, language referring to the features andadvantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, orcharacteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included inat least one embodiment. Thus, discussions of the features andadvantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, butdo not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.

Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics ofthe invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or moreembodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, in light ofthe description herein, that the invention can be practiced without oneor more of the specific features or advantages of a particularembodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages maybe recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in allembodiments of the invention.

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “anembodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature,structure, or characteristic described in connection with the indicatedembodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the phrases “inone embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughoutthis specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the sameembodiment.

Computers have been used to mathematically describe, model, simulate,and optimize buildings. However, conventional computer-based techniquesutilize PC-based computer platforms with limited computing capacity toperform very specific operations that are focused on a single issue,e.g., structural performance, temperature modeling, or workflowoptimization. Because of the inherent limitations of PC-based computingresources, conventional design, modeling, simulation, and optimizationoperations are forced to rely on relatively crude mathematical modelsthat can only evaluate a few design options in a reasonable amount oftime. Some characteristics that add complexity to a building system are:the system components do not necessarily have mathematically similarstructures and may involve different scales in time or space; the numberof components may be large, sometimes enormous; components can beconnected in a variety of different ways, most often nonlinearly and/orvia a network; local and system wide phenomena may depend on each otherin complicated ways; the behavior of the overall system can be difficultto predict from the behavior of individual components; and the overallsystem behavior may evolve along qualitatively different pathways thatmay display great sensitivity to small perturbations at any stage.Because of the complexity of such building systems, it is difficult ifnot impossible to comprehensively design, model, simulate, or optimizesuch building systems on a PC-based computer platform in a manner thatwill provide significant advances beyond the conventional techniques.

In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a holistic approachto a complex building system involves using high-productivityhigh-performance (HP2) computing resources to manage a complex buildingsystem from building inception through to building operation. Forexample, HP2 computing resources are used to translate a set of customerneeds to a complete virtual building design that can be used toconstruct a building. Further, the information generated during thedesign of a virtual building can be used as the basis of informationthat is later used to fabricate, commission, and operate a built versionof the virtual building. Because HP2 computing resources are used,modeling, optimization, simulation, and verification can be performedfrom a single platform on a scale which heretofore has not been appliedto complex building systems. Additionally, the holistic approach tocomplex building systems involves using a centralized database to manageall of the information related to a building system. The centralizeddatabase concept is in contrast to the conventional approach where eachdifferent discipline (e.g., architects, structural engineers, electricalengineers, etc.) maintains its own proprietary database ofdiscipline-specific information.

FIG. 1 illustrates a holistic building management system 100 thatutilizes HP2 computing resources to implement a Building RealizationPlatform (BRP) 102 that takes a building project from inception (e.g.,customer needs) to building operation. The BRP is a central hub ofbuilding information that can be maintained from the initialspecification of customer needs through building operation. In anembodiment, the BRP includes realization engines 104 and a buildingdatabase 106. In an embodiment, the realization engines include thelogic to drive the design, modeling, simulation, optimization, andverification operations related to a building system and the buildingdatabase includes stored data related to the building system (virtualand/or real) that is designed, modeled, simulated, optimized, andverified by the realization engine.

From a high-level perspective, the BRP 102 supports a series ofhierarchical domains that run in a process flow from more abstract toless abstract. The hierarchical domains shown in FIG. 1 are, from moreabstract to less abstract, customer needs 110, business model 112,spatial arrangement 114, systems integration 116, fabrication 118,assembly 120, commissioning 122, and operation 124. In the lifecycle ofa complex building system, each of the domains is dependent on the dataassociated with the previous domains. As such, FIG. 1 also illustrates atemporal relationship between the different domains in that certaindetails of a preceding domain must be specified before the process canmove to the next domain. Additionally, the dependencies between domainsare tracked to correspond to the requirements of the previous domain.

In an embodiment, the customer needs 110 domain relates to the desiredbuilding system from an owner perspective, that is, what is the use ofthe building system (e.g., healthcare, hospitality, etc.), where thebuilding system will be located, and what are the metrics and theirimportance to rate the quality of the design. The business model domain112 relates to the types and volumes of services that will be providedto satisfy the customer needs. The business model may also supportbehavioral modeling of the building system, and functional and spaceprograms of the building system. The spatial arrangement domain 114relates to the building system as a set of building structuresimplementing a desired architectural parti, with relative placed rooms.The systems integration domain 116 relates to a fully detailed facilityincluding defined 3D spaces and building infrastructure from whichdetailed construction documents can be derived. The fabrication domain118 relates to how and how many basic elements (i.e., building blocks)need to be fabricated to construct the building system (e.g., a list ofbuilding components). The assembly domain 120 relates to how and inwhich order the basic elements need to be assembled to construct thebuilding system. The commissioning domain 122 relates to the physicalbuilding system and its behavior. The commissioning domain may containinformation that is similar to the information held in the systemsintegration domain but also accounts for deviations that might haveoccurred during the fabrication and assembly of the building system. Theoperation domain 124 relates to the building system while in operation.In the operation domain, a virtual model of the building system can beused in real time to optimize processes such as room, staff, and patientscheduling, and to evaluate and adapt to unscheduled events.

In an embodiment, each complex building system is designed, modeled,simulated, optimized, and verified from building inception using apre-defined set of physical building components. The pre-defined set ofphysical building components may include, for example, structuralcomponents, deck components, and wall components. Each of thepre-defined physical building components has a set of knowncharacteristics (e.g., dimensions, materials of construction, structuralperformance, thermal performance) that can be utilized in the variousdomains of the BRP to produce more rapid and accurate results. Inparticular, the use of pre-defined physical building components allowsfor the development and reuse of mathematical models that enable design,modeling, simulation, optimization, and validation of complex buildingsystems. The pre-defined set of physical building components can betaken into consideration early on in the building design process, forexample, within the business model domain, the spatial arrangementdomain, and the systems integration domain.

Performing the processes described with reference to the BRP 102requires computing resources well beyond what can be provided by typicalPC-based computer systems. In an embodiment, the BRP utilizes HP2computing resources throughout the life cycle of a complex buildingsystem. FIG. 2 depicts an embodiment of an HP2 computer architecture 140in which the BRP can be implemented. In particular, the HP2 computerarchitecture includes a high capacity networked storage system 142, alarge scale processing system 144, and user interface devices 146, e.g.,client machines. Additionally, load balancers 148 and flow servers 150may be provisioned from the large-scale processing system.

The user interface devices 146 may be client machines, typically desktopcomputers, laptop computers, or tablet computers, on which a session canbe opened to control the design flow and to view the performance resultsof a particular building system design. The user interface devices allowa user to provide design intent and invoke design and analysis steps.Results come in to the user interface devices as they become available.In an embodiment, the user interface devices are used to access abrowser-based user interface of the BRP 102 via an access network 152.

The high capacity networked storage system 142 includes memory forstoring the software code that is used to implement the realizationengine and for storing data related to multiple different complexbuilding systems that are managed using the BRP. In the embodiment ofFIG. 2, the high-capacity network storage system includes a networkedcombination of storage servers 154 that provide storage capacity on theorder of Terabits of data.

In contrast to conventional techniques in which each differentdiscipline, e.g., architects, structural engineers, electricalengineers, HVAC engineers, etc., has its own internal proprietarycomputer networks and a database of building information, the computerarchitecture depicted in FIG. 2 includes a central repository for datathat spans multiple different disciplines related to a complex buildingsystem. For example, the data for a specific building may include datarelated to the customer needs, the business model, spatial arrangement,systems integration, fabrication, assembly, commissioning, andoperation. This may include information that crosses many of thedisciplines that are conventionally involved in the life cycle of abuilding. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the large-capacity storage system142 includes one or more storage servers that store the buildingdatabase 106 information and one or more servers that store the computerinstructions to implement the realization engines 104.

In an embodiment, the database servers 154 store design informationorganized as follows: a construction data base, an analysis database, alibrary of process knowledge, and a library of design rules. Theconstruction database may contain various system descriptions that areindependent from how the systems were constructed. The analysis databasemay contain performance and quality results, obtained through variousanalyses and simulations of the systems contained in the constructiondatabase. The library of process knowledge may contain informationrelated to processes, people patterns, department patterns, buildingpatterns, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) routingpatterns. The library of design rules may contain building codes, suchas egress, fire and accessibility requirements, and industry bestpractices (note that there can be different sets of design rules storedto comply with local variations of building rules). Although an example,of a particular database organization is described, other ways oforganizing the data is possible.

The large-scale processing system 144 performs the computer processingthat is necessary to implement the BRP. For example, the large-scaleprocessing system performs high-volume mathematical computations toimplement the design, modeling, simulation, optimization, andverification of the BRP. In an embodiment, the large scale processingsystem includes multiple servers 158 (i.e., a server farm or computefarm) that each have many high-speed processors (e.g., on the order ofthousands and up), where the individual servers are connected to eachother by high-speed network links such as Gigabit Ethernet. Such largescale processing systems can perform on the order of Tera- (10¹²) toPeta- (10¹⁵) floating point operations per second (Flops), referred toas TFlops and PFlops, respectively. Examples of large scale processingsystems include the CRAY XT3, having 3,328 processing cores and the CRAYXT5, having 14,752 processing cores. In an embodiment, the large scaleprocessing system utilizes a grid computing architecture and/ormulti-core processors to implement distributed computing according to a“MapReduce” framework. Although examples of the large-scale processingsystem are described, other large-scale processing systems are possible.

The flow servers 150, which can be virtual, one per user interfacedevice 146 and design, may be compute engines borrowed from the largescale processing system 144 (e.g., server farm), which execute theinstructions that implement the BRP design flow. In an embodiment, theflow servers hold the design state of each unique design. That is, theflow servers know the phase of the design cycle for a particular design.Typically, the flow servers hold just enough of the design in memory toallow efficient transfer of design intent, results, and job submission.For computationally intensive tasks, the flow servers submit processingjobs (i.e., computational tasks) to the load balancer 148 and the loadbalancer distributes the computational tasks based on project, user, andtask priorities.

Compute servers 158 of the large-scale processing system 144 are used bythe flow servers 150 to perform computational intensive tasks using, forexample, map reduced or “MapReduce” techniques for parallel processing.In an embodiment, the compute servers are pooled among flow servers bythe load balancer 148. The compute servers can pull large amounts ofdesign information directly from the database servers 154 of the highcapacity network storage system 142 and save raw results back to thestorage system.

In an embodiment, some or all of the computing resources (excluding theuser interface devices) are provided as a “cloud service.” For example,the HP2 computing resources of FIG. 2 are provided as a cloud servicewithin a network cloud 160. That is, the computing resources are notowned by the owner or user of the BRP, but are instead utilized and paidfor by the owner or user of the BRP on an as needed basis. For example,cloud services such as those provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) maybe utilized to implement the BRP 102.

The HP2 computing architecture 140 depicted in FIG. 2 differs fromconventional industry practices in many ways. In particular, thefunctions of control and presentation are isolated in thin client userinterface devices 146, while all compute tasks are performed in a wellcontrolled and high performance cloud service containing both thecompute and database servers. The compute machines are not allocated pertype of task or discipline (architects, construction engineer,mechanical engineer, operations analyst), but are pooled to serve asflow servers and compute engines. This centralized approach optimizesefficiency in that the flow servers are drawn out of the compute pool asa design session starts and the flow servers coordinate all tasks forthat design session. Additionally, the database servers are notorganized per discipline, that is, they are not organized separately foreach discipline, e.g., one database server each for the architect, theconstruction engineer, the mechanical engineer, and the operationsanalyst. In the architecture of FIG. 2, high bandwidth/high volume datatransactions occur only between the database servers 154 and the computeservers 158.

The BRP 102 and the HP2 computing architecture 140 as described withreference to FIGS. 1 and 2 are utilized in combination to implement ahierarchical parallel design technique, from building inception to afully defined systems integration, which heretofore has not beenenvisioned in the field of building design. FIG. 3 illustrates anembodiment of a parallel hierarchical design technique that starts atthe customer needs, e.g., building inception, and runs through to amultitude of fully defined systems integrations. Using HP2 computingresources, many different options can be realized and vetted in parallelwithin each domain from business modeling, to spatial arrangement, tosystems integration. At each step in the process, instance-specific datacan be stored and maintained for use in subsequent design analysisand/or modification. Additionally, the parallel hierarchical approachallows for the development and tracking of many different design schemesthat all relate back to the same set of customer needs. In theembodiment of FIG. 3, a database of customer needs 170 is used togenerate a set of different business models, business models databases172. The database of each different business model is used to generate aset of spatial arrangements, which are stored as spatial arrangementdatabases 174. The database of each different spatial arrangement isused to generate a set of systems integration designs, which are storedas systems integration design databases 176.

The parallel hierarchical process illustrated in FIG. 3 is now describedin more detail with reference to FIGS. 3-10. FIG. 4 depicts anembodiment of a user interface of the BRP 102 that includes selectabletabs or icons 180 for activating operations in the customer needs domain110, the business model domain 112, the spatial arrangement domain 114,the systems integration domain 116, and the fabrication domain 118 ofthe BRP. Within the customer needs domain, customer needs are specified.In an embodiment, customer needs are presented in a web-based userinterface at a client device as a formal description of customer needs.For example, the formal description of customer needs is a formaldescription of information, as known in computer science, whichcorrectly, precisely, and unambiguously represents certain concepts sothat the customer needs can be acted upon.

In an embodiment, customer needs are input to the BRP 102 via a clientdevice by an entity that is looking to build a building for a particularuse, such as a healthcare facility. For example, the entity or“customer” may specify that it wants to provide enough acute healthcareservices to residents within a specific ZIP code to meet anticipateddemand. In another embodiment, customer needs may reflect a projectlocation, service objectives, business objectives, and/or aprioritization of customer needs. For example, the customer needs mayspecify the types of services that will be provided in the building, thevolume of services that will be provided in the building, capitalinvestment limitations, return on investment (ROI) requirements, and/ormetrics to rate the quality of various design alternatives. Upon beingspecified, the customer needs are associated with a particular projectand stored in the database of the BRP.

In an embodiment, customer needs related to a healthcare building systeminclude a desired location for the building system, a model of care forthe building system, and values of the customer. With respect to values,the user interface may allow the user to rate, on a sliding scale, howthe user values concepts such as innovation, sustainability, life cyclecost, healthcare improvement, efficiency, and flexibility. In anembodiment, the customer needs domain can provide the user with outputssuch as a map of the desired building system location, census data forthe desired location, and public health information, such as Centers forDisease Control (CDC) information. In an embodiment, the map may includepointers or “pins” that identify related facilities, e.g., otherhealthcare facilities, doctors, labs, etc., which are located in thevicinity of the desired location.

The information related to the customer needs can then be stored in thecustomer needs database 170 of the BRP 102. For example, the project isgiven a name and the project information including the location, modelof care, value ratings, map information, census information, and CDCinformation is all stored in the BRP's database under the project name.Different projects can be established with different project names andany of the user specific criteria in the customer needs domain can bechanged.

With customer needs specified, the process can move to the businessmodel domain 112, were customer needs are used as input and multipledifferent business models are provided as an output. In the embodimentof FIG. 3, three different business models are provided as an output(BM1, BM2, and BM3), although it should be understood that many moredifferent business models could be generated from the same set ofcustomer needs. In an embodiment, a business model defines the “program”of the building needed to meet the specified customer needs. Forexample, the business model specifies what types of services will beprovided in the building and at what volume the services will beprovided. The business model may also specify an initial shell of thebuilding. Therefore, the business model may include both spacedimensions and time dimensions.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, multiple different business models can begenerated in parallel from the same set of customer needs. In anembodiment, the generation of business models includes a computationallyintensive process of design, simulation, optimization, and validationthat is able to generate and evaluate a large number of differentdesigns in parallel. For example, it is possible to design, simulate,optimize, and validate on the order of hundreds to thousands ofdifferent iterations related to the business models in tens of minutes(e.g., less than one hour) from a single set of customer needs.

In an embodiment, one computationally intensive operation performed inthe business model domain 112 involves behavioral simulation todetermine the types and volumes of services that should be provided by aparticular building. Behavioral simulations are well suited for thestudy of the processes that underlie formulation and implementation of abusiness model. For example, behavioral simulations may involvemeasuring variables at multiple levels, controlling or measuring thecontext, dealing with historical facts, capturing process differencesacross issues, and linking processes to outcomes. The behavioralsimulations performed in the business model domain are logically linkedto the resulting design, construction, and operation of the building.

Throughout the business model domain 112, the BRP 102 tracksdependencies back to the customer needs so that there is a directrelationship between the customer needs and the business models that aregenerated to meet the customer needs. A change in the customer needs canbe propagated to the business model domain and changes can be made tothe business model as needed to meet customer needs. Additionally,already generated business models can be evaluated in light of changesto the customer needs. Further, each instance of each different businessmodel is uniquely stored in the database so that each instance can beindependently accessed and modified. Unique storage of each instance ofa business model allows individual business models to be accessed,evaluated, and/or modified without affecting other business models thatcorrespond to the same set of customer needs.

In an embodiment, the business model identifies the service lines (e.g.,emergency care, well care, imaging, laboratory) and/or departments thatare to be provided by the building system, the patient load on thebuilding system, and the room and staff needs (e.g., the number andtypes of rooms and the number and types of staff). The outputs of thebusiness model can be provided to a user via a user interface of the BRP102.

FIG. 5 depicts an embodiment of a user interface from the business modeldomain 112 of the BRP 102. The user interface displays information aboutthe business model such as number of medical doctors (MDs), number ofmedical assistants (MAs), number of registered nurses (RNs), number oftriage areas, number of trauma rooms, number of acute-care exam rooms,number of exam rooms, number of observation beds, number of imagingrooms, number of surgery rooms, and number of beds. Within the businessmodel domain, the behavior of the building system can be simulated basedon the criteria of the building model and various workflow logic that isincorporated into the BRP. The user interface of the BRP also enablescertain parameters of the business model to be modified for use insimulation. For example, the user interface enables the user to adjustparameters related to any of the business models, such as the number ofacute-care exam rooms, the number of exam rooms, the number ofobservation rooms, the number of trauma rooms, the number of medicaldoctors, and the number of registered nurses.

FIG. 6 depicts an embodiment of a user interface from the business modeldomain 112 that shows simulation results generated within the businessmodel domain. For example, the results relate to the length of stay ofpatients given a certain set of input parameters. In an embodiment,event driven simulations are implemented and the different simulationsare set up to use specific HP2 computing resources. For example, eachcomputational operation is mapped to a specific set of processinghardware in the large-scale processing system using MapReducetechniques.

Referring back to FIG. 3, with various different business modelsspecified, the parallel hierarchical process can move to the spatialarrangement domain, where business models are used as input and multipledifferent spatial arrangements are provided as an output. In theembodiment of FIG. 3, at least three different spatial arrangements aregenerated for each business model. As shown, spatial arrangements SA11,SA12, and SA13 are generated from BM1, spatial arrangements SA21, SA22,and SA23 are generated from BM2, and spatial arrangements SA31, SA32,and SA33 are generated from BM3. Although three different spatialarrangements are generated from each business module, it should beunderstood that many more different spatial arrangements could begenerated from the same set of business models. In an embodiment, aspatial arrangement defines a building system as a 3D space thatincludes the basic structure of the building and the placement of rooms.For example, the spatial arrangement defines the approximate squarefootage of the building, the number of floors in the building, and thenumber, types, locations, square footage, and functionality of the roomswithin the building.

In an embodiment, the spatial arrangements are generated in parallelusing the computational resources of the large scale processing system.For example, the computing resources of the large scale processingsystem are used to design, model, simulate, optimize, and verify thedifferent spatial arrangements.

In an embodiment, processing in the spatial arrangement domain 114involves the computer assisted placement of departments and/or roomsbased on adjacency criteria and behavioral simulation performance. Usingcomputer-assisted placement and HP2 computing resources, many differentspatial arrangements can be modeled, simulated, optimized, and verifiedin a relatively short period of time. For example, an energy efficiencysimulation of the building system may involve one thousand separatecomputational tasks or jobs that each require one hour to complete.Using HP2 computing resources, the one thousand separate computationaltasks can be processed in parallel by separate processors (e.g.,separate physical hardware devices), reducing the time required tocomplete the entire task by roughly one thousand fold.

Within the spatial arrangement domain 114, the BRP 102 tracksdependencies back to the corresponding business models so that there isa direct relationship between the spatial arrangements, the buildingmodels, and ultimately the customer needs. A change in the customerneeds or business model domains can be propagated to the spatialarrangement domain and changes can be made to the spatial arrangementsas necessary. Further, each instance of each different spatialarrangement can be uniquely stored in the database so that each instancecan be independently accessed and manipulated. Because the businessmodels and spatial arrangements are maintained in hierarchical order,only changes that affect a particular hierarchical chain need to bepropagated to the spatial arrangements. For example, if a change is madeto an aspect of BM1 only, the change can be propagated to the spatialarrangements, SA11, SA12, and SA13 only, while the spatial arrangementsthat are linked to BM2 and BM3 (e.g., SA21, SA22, SA23, and SA31, SA32,SA33, respectively) are not affected.

In an embodiment, a spatial arrangement specifies aspects of thebuilding system related to “form and shell,” “block and stack,” and“room placement.” In an embodiment, the form and shell within thespatial arrangement domain 114 specifies parameters such as the shape(e.g., architectural pattern or architectural parti) and dimensions ofthe building system. The form and shell may also specify the orientationand location of the building on the site specified in the customerneeds. From the specified form and shell, various models, simulations,and/or optimizations can be performed using the HP2 computing resources.For example, using the HP2 computing resources, energy efficiencysimulations and optimization operations can be performed on a scale thatheretofore has not been possible. FIG. 7 depicts an embodiment of a userinterface from the form and shell tab in the spatial arrangement domainthat shows adjustable parameters of an energy efficiency simulation thatis implemented at the form and shell level. Adjustable parameters forthe simulation include the time of year (e.g., month), the orientationof the building, and glazing-to-opacity ratios in different directions,e.g., east, west, north, south.

In an embodiment, block and stack within the spatial arrangement domain114 specifies how departmental blocks and circulation elements areplaced within the specified form and shell of the building system. Forexample, the block and stack defines how departmental blocks areconfigured relative to each other in the horizontal direction and howdepartmental blocks are configured, or “stacked,” relative to each otherin the vertical direction (e.g., between different floors of amultistory building). From the specified block and stack, variousmodels, simulations, and/or optimizations can be performed using the HP2computing resources. For example, operations may include interactivedepartmental distance exploration, behavioral simulation with departmentdistances, and generation of individual departmental blocks. FIG. 8depicts an embodiment of a user interface from the block and stack tabof the spatial arrangement domain that shows the output of a simulationto determine travel distances and times between certain departmentsgiven a particular block and stack.

In an embodiment, room placement within the spatial arrangement domain114 specifies the locations of specific rooms within a building systemhaving a specific block and stack arrangement. From the specified roomplacement, various models, simulations, and/or optimizations can beperformed using the HP2 computing resources. For example, operations mayinclude interactive room distance exploration, behavioral simulationwith room distances, and egress design rule checking FIGS. 9 and 10depict user interfaces from the room placement tab of the spatialarrangement domain. In particular, FIG. 9 depicts certain adjustablecriteria for room placement and FIG. 10 depicts different room placementdesigns that are generated based on a given set of criteria.

Referring back to FIG. 3, with various different spatial arrangementsgenerated and stored, the process can move to the systems integrationdomain, where spatial arrangements are used as input and multipledifferent systems integration designs are provided as an output. In anembodiment, a systems integration design defines the 3D spaces of abuilding and the infrastructure of the building. For example, thesystems integration design for a building defines the locations in threedimensions (i.e., “3D spaces) of the infrastructure elements of thebuilding system. The building infrastructure specified in the systemsintegration design may include, for example, the location andspecifications of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems,information technology (IT), safety and security elements, and lighting.In the systems integration designs, the locations of the buildinginfrastructure elements are fully defined and integrated into the 3Dspaces of the building system. In an embodiment, the systems integrationdesigns are generated in parallel using the computational resources ofthe large scale processing system to design, model, simulate, optimize,and verify the different systems integration designs.

In the embodiment of FIG. 3, at least three different systemsintegrations are generated for each spatial arrangement. As shown,systems integration designs SI111, SI112, SI113 are generated forspatial arrangement SA11, systems integration designs SI121, SI122, andSI123 are generated for spatial arrangement SA12, systems integrationdesigns SI131, SI132, and SI133 are generated for spatial arrangementSA13, and so on for a total of twenty-seven different systemsintegration designs. Although three different systems integrationdesigns are generated for each spatial arrangement, it should beunderstood that many more different systems integration designs could begenerated from the same set of spatial arrangements. As illustrated inFIG. 3, a large number of design options can be generated from the sameset of customer needs. Further, the computational task of designing,modeling, simulating, optimizing, and verifying all of the differentdesign options can grow to be quite large quite fast. Hence, the use ofHP2 computing resources along with a centralized BRP 102 is key toenabling the parallel hierarchical design technique.

In an embodiment, the process of going from a set of customer needs to asystems integration design is supported by a unified data model that ismaintained by the BRP 102. FIG. 11 illustrates an example of a unifieddata model 190 that is used by the BRP in the design, modeling,simulation, optimization, and verification of a computer buildingsystem. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the unified data model includes abehavioral hierarchy 192, a spatial hierarchy 194, and a physicalhierarchy 196.

In an embodiment, the behavioral hierarchy 192 defines the operationaland business processes from single activities by individuals indedicated rooms using specific equipment, to processes in departments,processes in service lines or business units to a building-wideoperational model. The behavioral description can have various degreesof abstraction. For example, a department can be described as a singleactivity incurring costs and producing revenue, towards an activityhandling patients, taking time, incurring costs and producing revenue,or an activity of staff handling patients, requiring specific equipment.Besides the human behavioral description, there can also be behavioraldescriptions for non-human elements such as, for example, energy, light,and water. In FIG. 11, the behavioral hierarchy ranges from activity, toprocess, to service, to building operations, with each level in thebehavioral hierarchy being more abstract than its predecessor.

In an embodiment, the spatial hierarchy 194 describes how the volume ofa building is organized. For example, a building has stories, each storyhas departmental blocks and corridors, departmental blocks have rooms,hallways and circulation spaces, rooms containfurniture/fixtures/equipment (FFE) elements. Spatial descriptions canhave various degrees of abstraction. For example, a building can bedescribed from a vague buildable volume, a volume dictated by the site,physical constraints, legal constraints, and owner desires, towards theconcept of an architectural parti describing a building configuration,e.g., an atrium versus a spine, towards a description of the majorhorizontal and vertical circulation areas, towards a global allocationof departments into various sections of the building, towards the exactlocation of every room and corridor in the building. In FIG. 11, thespatial hierarchy ranges from room layout, to department layout, toblock and stack layout, to building layout, with each level in thespatial hierarchy being more abstract than its predecessor.

The physical hierarchy 196 describes how the physical building will becomposed from a list of predefined building components. In FIG. 11, thephysical hierarchy ranges from material, to elements, to systems, tobuildings, with each level in the physical hierarchy being more abstractthan its predecessor. For example, the building elements may include aset of predefined physical components such as interior walls, exteriorwalls, floor panels, roof panels, bathroom pods, aggregate equipmentwall floor modules, equipment components and pods, utility frames, rebarcages for concrete structures, metal and concrete floor assemblies,structural steel, and utility systems. In an embodiment, certain aspectsof the building components, such as dimensions, performancecharacteristics, aesthetic ratings, environmental concerns, cost,product life, etc., are known in advance and used as desired in thedifferent domains of the BRP 102. As stated above, the use of predefinedbuilding components, each with known characteristics, allows for thedevelopment and reuse of mathematical models to design, model, simulate,optimize, and verify complex building systems.

For each of the data hierarchies and at each hierarchical level, thereis both an abstract description and one or more structural descriptions.That is, within the unified data model, an object is described asconsisting of a set of connected instances of objects of a lower level.For example, a process of a patient coming in for a regular exam couldbe described as a connected graph of individual activities involvingdifferent people and occurring at different locations. The unified datamodel may be used by the BRP in the design, simulation, optimization,and/or verification operations.

A parallel hierarchical design technique has been described withreference to FIGS. 1-11. As explained above, the parallel hierarchicaldesign technique uses a centralized BRP 102 and an HP2 computingarchitecture 140 to process many different business models, spatialarrangements, and systems integration designs in parallel and in ahierarchical fashion that maintains design dependencies. An embodimentof a technique for generating a systems integration design from a set ofcustomer needs is now described in more detail with reference to FIG.12. In particular, FIG. 12 is a process flow diagram of a computer-basedtechnique for generating a systems integration design from a set ofcustomer needs. The technique utilizes a highly iterative computer-basedprocess loop 200 that relies on computationally intensive simulation,optimization, and verification operations performed by HP2 computingresources to implement a design process that heretofore has not beenenvisioned and could not have been accomplished using a conventionalPC-based computer system and conventional building design processes,including discipline-specific proprietary databases.

At block 202, customer needs are specified. For example, the customerneeds are specified through a user interface that queries a user toinput customer needs according to a specific functional description.Examples of information processed at the customer needs domain have beendescribed above.

At block 202, additional information such as information related to bestpractices, including building and/or operational flow, and buildingcodes may be entered as part of the customer needs. For example, theremay be location-specific and/or customer-specific best practices andbuilding codes that should be incorporated into the design from thebuilding inception. The customer needs (including best practices andbuilding codes) are stored in the database as described above.

At block 204, at least one business model is generated in response tothe customer needs. In an embodiment, the business model specifies whatservices the building is to offer and at what volume the services are tobe offered. In the case of a customer looking to provide acutehealthcare services to the residents of a particular ZIP code, thebusiness model may define the type and volume of acute healthcareservices that should be provided to meet anticipated demand. At block206, the behavior of one or more of the business models is simulated. Inan embodiment, a behavioral simulation uses workflow modeling tosimulate how the specified services could be provided. For example, asimulation could compare people and process workflow patterns with spacepatterns to determine how a proposed business model would perform. Theresults of the behavioral simulations can be output in the form ofperformance metrics, for example, as graphs or ratings of suchparameters as patient wait times, machine utilization, number of staffrequired, staff utilization, space utilization, energy efficiency, etc.Various different parameters can be used to evaluate the desirability ofbusiness models based on the behavioral simulation.

At block 208, the results of the behavioral simulations can be evaluatedto see if the customer needs have been met. This can be a manualprocess, which includes direct human interaction, an automatic process(no human interaction), which is based on preprogrammed criteria, or acombination thereof. At block 210, it is also possible to modify thecustomer needs and/or the business model. A modification of the customerneeds and or business model can be propagated downstream in the flow,including for example, the behavioral simulation.

At block 212, once the behavioral simulation has shown that a particularbusiness model meets the customer needs, the business model can be putthrough a computer-based optimization process. For example, thecomputer-based optimization process can run through a large number ofdesign alternatives to optimize certain aspects of the building design.In an embodiment, an optimization process attempts to optimize areas ofimportance that are specified in the customer needs. For example, if thecustomer needs place a high value on worker convenience, then designsthat minimize worker walking distances may be favored. Likewise, if thecustomer needs place a high value on energy efficiency, then designsthat minimize the need for artificial light and HVAC may be favored.Other criteria for optimization may include Return on Investment (ROI),capital expense operating expense, patient wait time, or any combinationthereof.

In a complex building system such a hospital, the customer needs willspecify a wide range of design priorities that can only be optimizedthrough a multidimensional analysis of a large number of designvariables. The multidimensional analysis of a large number of designvariables is computationally processed by the HP2 computing resources asdescribed with reference to FIG. 2.

Once a business model has been optimized, at block 214, the optimizedbusiness model is put through a validation process. The validationprocess checks to see if a particular business model meets particulardesign rules (e.g., design rule checking) and/or to see if the businessmodule meets the specified customer needs. The process of generating anew business model (or modifying an already existing business model),behaviorally simulating the new business model, optimizing the newbusiness model, and validating the new business model, can be runthrough multiple iterations before the design moves to the spatialarrangement domain.

At block 216, each validated business model can be used as input togenerate one or more spatial arrangements. As described above, a spatialarrangement may specify the form and shell of a building system, theblock and stack arrangement of the building system, and the roomplacement. The spatial arrangement may be simulated and/or optimized asdescribed using the HP2 computing resources. At blocks 218 and 220, thespatial arrangement can be processed through an iterative process ofverification and modification. For example, the verification operationmay involve design rule checking and the modification may involveadjusting one or more parameters of the spatial arrangement.

At block 222, each verified spatial arrangement can be used as input togenerate one or more systems integration designs. As described above,the systems integration design may specify the 3D spaces andinfrastructure of the building system. In the systems integrationdomain, the systems integration design may be simulated and optimized asdesired using the HP2 computing resources. At blocks 224 and 226, thespatial integration design can be processed through an iterative processof verification and modification. For example, the verificationoperation may involve design rule checking and the modification mayinvolve adjusting one or more parameters of the systems integrationdesign. The output of the systems integration design can be used toimplement operations in the manufacturing, assembly, commissioning, andoperation domains as represented by blocks 228, 230, 232, and 234,respectively.

FIG. 13 illustrates system elements and a corresponding process flow forgenerating a spatial arrangement from a business model using the BRP102. The system elements include at least one of the business modeldatabases 170, at least one of the spatial arrangement databases 174, ananalysis database 240, a building design knowledge base 242, synthesistools 244, analysis tools 246 (e.g., simulation and/or validation), andoptimization tools 248. In the building design knowledge base, a codesand rules element 250 includes building codes and building design rules,a patterns element 252 includes a pre-established set of design patterns(e.g., architectural patterns or architectural partis), a healthcare(HC) processes element 254 includes healthcare process workflow rules,and a rooms library 256 includes a pre-established set of rooms thathave certain physical and/or operational characteristics. In operation,the information from the business model is processed by the synthesistools to generate one or more spatial arrangements. The synthesis toolsuse information from the building design knowledge base and designintent 258 (e.g., design criteria) to generate a spatial arrangement.The spatial arrangement can then be analyzed (e.g., simulated and/orvalidated) as desired and the results of the analysis are stored in theanalysis database. The optimization tool can be used to changeparameters of the design intent (e.g., the orientation of the building(see FIG. 7) or the number of rooms per wing or the nurse ratio (seeFIG. 9)), which are then propagated through the synthesis tools togenerate optimized spatial arrangements.

Although the BRP 102 has been described above in the context of ahealthcare building such as a hospital, the above described BRP andassociated techniques are applicable to other buildings and buildingsystems. For example, the BRP and associated techniques may beapplicable to hospitality buildings (e.g., hotels),apartment/condominium buildings, and transportation facilities (e.g.,airports). Additionally, a building system may include one or morebuildings that can be detached from each other, partially attached toeach other, or fully attached to each other. For example, a buildingsystem may be a building or a set of buildings that are located at thesame physical site/location and that are intended to fulfill a set ofcustomer needs.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment of the architecture of an embodimentof the BRP relative to a user interface device 146 on a client side of anetwork and a cloud service from which the BRP 102 is implemented. Asdepicted in FIG. 14, the BRP includes a BRP application 300, realizationengines 302, an application programming interface (API) 304, amiddleware connector 306, and a database 308. In an embodiment, therealization engines provide the design, modeling, simulation,optimization, and verification services of the BRP and the BRPapplication provides the logic that allows the user of the client deviceto communicate with and control, via a user interface, the services thatare provided by the realization engines. The API provides the logic toenable the realization engines to obtain data from and provide data tothe database. The middleware connector provides an abstraction layerbetween the realization engines and the database. The database storesdata related to the design, modeling, simulation, optimization, andverification of building systems. In the embodiment of FIG. 14, thedatabase includes a construction database 310, an analysis database 312,a library of process knowledge 314, and a library of design rules 316although the data in the database can be organized in other ways. In anembodiment, the computer readable instructions necessary to implementthe BRP application, the realization engines, the API, and themiddleware connector and the data in the database are stored in serversof the cloud service. When called upon for execution, the instructionsand corresponding data are processed by processors of the cloud serviceas described above.

FIG. 15 illustrates the execution of a service that is provided by oneof the realization engines 302. For example, the service is a simulationthat involves distributing a set of computational tasks amongst a largenumber of physically distinct processors or separate processing cores.As shown in FIG. 15, N different computational tasks related to the samesimulation operation are distributed amongst N different processors 350,where N is, for example, in the range of 100-1,000. As described above,the processors may be provided through a cloud service and used only onan as needed basis.

In an embodiment, the BRP 102 allows the generation and optimization ofa virtual building based on user needs and a comprehensive set of rulesincluding building codes and best practices in the correspondingindustries. Users create virtual buildings using a design flow thatmorphs the design gradually from a very abstract description (forexample, serve an area defined by a set of ZIP codes with enough acutecare capacity to satisfy demand) to a fully detailed descriptioncontaining architectural intent, engineering details, and constructiondetails that leave no ambiguity as to how the building should be builtand how the building system will perform. Once a virtual building iscomplete within the BRP, detailed operation and construction documentscan be generated by the BRP in various industry standard formats. In anembodiment, a virtual building system maintained by the BRP containsdetailed information about the building and all its subsystems, andabout its use and its performance along many dimensions such asoperating costs, construction costs, thermal comfort level, daylightusage, sustainability, operational efficiency, patient experience. Thevirtual building system maintained by the BRP is detailed and accurateenough that it can be used to unambiguously generate detailedconstruction documents for the construction of a real building systemhaving a performance that matches the performance of the virtualbuilding system.

In an embodiment, the virtual building system that is maintained by theBRP can be used to predict the implications of changes during thelifetime of the building. In an embodiment, the virtual building systemincludes descriptions of: the building structure; the processes andservice lines, the mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP) subsystems;the information technology (IT) subsystem; the thermal/energy behavior;the seismic behavior; the light behavior; and the sound behavior. In anembodiment, the virtual building system maintained in the BRP differsfrom current practices in the following ways: Besides the description ofthe physical building, the virtual building system also includes thedescription of the purpose and operation of the building as both thebuilding and the processes need to be designed and measured together.The information about the building is partitioned differently.Traditionally, information is grouped per domain (building structure,mechanical system, electrical system) with a loose coupling betweenvarious domains. This is done because the toolsets for the differentdomains differ and because the domain-specific information resides withdifferent companies. Here, information of all domains is grouped bysequence in which design decisions are made and information becomesavailable. Unlike current building information modeling (BIM) practices,where the overall architecture is a federated network of isolatedsystems, each holding a part of the golden design information andexchanging a minimum information with each other using standardprotocols on a need basis, the approach described herein is a starconfiguration where different systems communicate exclusively throughthe BRP. The golden design information resides in a central database andthe satellite systems are used as agents that change the central goldeninformation and report back.

FIG. 16 is a process flow diagram of a method for realizing a complexbuilding system. At block 400, input related to customer needs for abuilding system is received, the input being received through a userinterface at a remote client device and being expressed in a formaldescription language. At block 402, multiple different business modelsare generated from the customer needs input, wherein the business modelsdefine, in a functional language, types and volumes of services thatwill be provided within the building system to satisfy the customerneeds. At block 404, multiple different spatial arrangements aregenerated from at least one of the business models, wherein the spatialarrangements define a form and shell of the building system, a block andstack of the building system, and room locations within the buildingsystem. At block 406, multiple different systems integration designs aregenerated from at least one of the spatial arrangements, wherein thesystems integration designs define three dimensional spaces ofinfrastructure of the building system. At block 408, dependencies aretracked between the customer needs, the business models, the spatialarrangements, and the systems integration designs.

FIG. 17 is a process flow diagram of a method for realizing a buildingsystem within which healthcare services will be provided to patients. Atblock 420, input related to customer needs for a building system isreceived, the input being received through a user interface at a remoteclient device and being expressed in a formal description language, theinput including an indication of a location at which the building systemis to be built. At block 422, at least one business model is generatedfrom the customer needs input, wherein the business model defines, in afunctional language, types and volumes of healthcare services that willbe provided via the building system. At block 424, an aspect of thebusiness model is simulated. At block 426, an aspect of the businessmodel is optimized. At block 428, at least one spatial arrangement ofthe building system is generated from the at least one business model,wherein the spatial arrangement of the building system defines a formand shell of the building system, a block and stack of the buildingsystem, and a placement of rooms of the building system. At block 430,an aspect of the spatial arrangement of the building system issimulated. At block 432, the computationally intensive operations ofsimulation and optimization are distributed over multiple differentprocessors of a large scale processing system.

Although the operations of the method(s) herein are shown and describedin a particular order, the order of the operations of each method may bealtered so that certain operations may be performed in an inverse orderor so that certain operations may be performed, at least in part,concurrently with other operations. In another embodiment, instructionsor sub-operations of distinct operations may be implemented in anintermittent and/or alternating manner.

It should also be noted that at least some of the operations for themethods may be implemented using software instructions stored on anon-transitory computer useable storage medium for execution by acomputer. As an example, an embodiment of a computer program productincludes a computer useable storage medium to store a computer readableprogram that, when executed on a computer, causes the computer toperform operations, as described herein.

Furthermore, embodiments of at least portions of the invention can takethe form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usableor non-transitory computer-readable medium providing computer executableinstructions, or program code, for use by or in connection with acomputer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of thisdescription, a non-transitory computer-usable or computer readablemedium can be any apparatus that can contain or store the program foruse by or in connection with the instruction execution system,apparatus, or device.

The computer-useable or computer-readable medium can be an electronic,magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system(or apparatus or device). Examples of a computer-readable medium includea semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removablecomputer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory(ROM), a rigid magnetic disk, and an optical disk. Current examples ofoptical disks include a compact disk with read only memory (CD-ROM), acompact disk with read/write (CD-R/W), and a digital video disk (DVD).

In an embodiment, the above-described functionality is performed by acomputer or computers, which executes computer readable instructions.FIG. 18 depicts a computer 500 that includes a processor 502, memory504, and a communications interface 506. The processor may include amultifunction processor and/or an application-specific processor.Examples of processors include the PowerPC™ family of processors by IBMand the x86 family of processors by Intel such as the Xeon™ family ofprocessors and the Intel X5650 processor. The memory within the computermay include, for example, storage medium such as read only memory (ROM),flash memory, RAM, and a large capacity permanent storage device such asa hard disk drive. The communications interface enables communicationswith other computers via, for example, the Internet Protocol (IP). Thecomputer executes computer readable instructions stored in the storagemedium to implement various tasks as described above.

As described above, the business model (BM) domain produces certainoutputs, such as the building square footage needed to provide thedesired services, which are used within the spatial arrangement (SA)domain to define certain aspects of the building system. For example,within the spatial arrangement domain certain physical aspects of thebuilding system are defined, including the building “form and shell,”the building “block and stack,” and the room placement.

The building system “form and shell” can also be referred to as the“building massing configuration.” As used herein, the building massingconfiguration is at least partially defined by the footprint shape ofthe building system, the footprint dimensions, and the number of floorsof the building.

In reality, there is almost an infinite number of different buildingmassing configurations that can be employed to meet the needs of aparticular business model. That is, multiple different building massingconfigurations can support the desired use of the building, e.g., typesand volume of services to be provided within a healthcare buildingsystem. Although multiple different building massing configurations maymeet the needs of a particular business model, the massing configurationof a building has an effect on energy use. For example, a long andnarrow building massing configuration will have more exposed surfacearea than a square building of the same square footage. Among manyfactors, the differences in exposed surface area can have a large effecton the cost to heat and/or cool the building. Therefore, it is desirableto be able to evaluate many different building massing configurations interms of energy efficiency, e.g., the energy use of the building, inorder to intelligently select a building massing configuration.

The energy use of a building can be characterized by running an energyuse simulation. Various computer-based energy use simulation programsare available, including for example, Building Loads Analysis and SystemThermodynamics (BLAST), DOE-2, eQUEST, ESP-r, and EnergyPlus. A widelyaccepted energy use simulation program is the U.S. Department ofEnergy's EnergyPlus simulation program. EnergyPlus takes intoconsideration a large list of parameters to simulate the energy use of abuilding. Parameters considered in an EnergyPlus simulation may include,for example, information about the building site, climate information,building construction specifics, building operating schedules, operatingloads, and building massing configuration. Some specific examples ofsimulation parameters include location coordinates, climate information,operating schedules, surface construction elements, thermal zonedescription/geometry, advanced surface concepts, detailed ground heattransfer, room air modules, internal gains (people, lights, otherinternal zone equipment), daylighting, exterior energy use equipment,and airflow. A detailed description of EnergyPlus input and output datacan be found in the document “Input Output Reference: The EncyclopedicReference to EnergyPlus Input and Output,” Oct. 6, 2012, which isincorporated by reference herein.

As the complexity of a building increases, the computationalrequirements of an energy simulation also increase. For example, anEnergyPlus simulation of a four-story 250,000 square foot building ofaverage complexity can take a single processor computer on the order of2-8 hours to complete, e.g., model, setup, and run time. The computingpower and time required to run EnergyPlus simulations can make itimpractical to evaluate a large number, e.g., 10,000-30,000, ofdifferent building massing configurations early on in the buildingdesign process. Without a way to efficiently evaluate the energy use ofa large number of building massing configurations, some desirablemassing configurations may never come to the fore in the design process.Therefore, there is a need to be able to quickly evaluate the energy useof a large number, e.g., 10,000-30,000, of different building massingconfigurations early on in the design process so that energy use, andhence energy efficiency, can be integrated into the building designprocess.

In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, formulas are derivedin advance for calculating the energy use of different building massingconfigurations so that a large number of different building massingconfigurations can be quickly evaluated for energy efficiency early onin the building design process. In an embodiment, the formulas are afunction of a limited set of parameters that are directly related to thebuilding massing configuration. For example, the formulas are a functionof the shape of the building footprint, the dimensions of the building,and the number of stories of the building. Because the formulas are afunction of a limited set of parameters, the energy use of a largenumber of building massing configurations can be quickly calculated forenergy use evaluation early on in the design process. Additionally, theformulas are normalized to a reference building such that the energy useof each different building massing configuration is compared to the samestandard, e.g., the reference building.

Given a set of building design parameters, the predefined and normalizedformulas are used in, for example, the Building Realization Platform(BRP) to calculate the energy use of multiple different building massingconfigurations so that the multiple different building massingconfigurations can be compared to each other in terms of energy use. Asan example, using the techniques that are described in more detailbelow, energy use indexes of over 20,000 different building massingconfigurations can be calculated in less than one minute. The energy useinformation can then be intelligently searched and sorted to identifydesirable building massing configurations. An embodiment of a techniquefor characterizing the energy use of multiple different building massingconfigurations is described below with reference to FIGS. 19 a-28.

In an embodiment, a technique for characterizing the energy use ofmultiple different building massing configurations is based on buildingdimensions that are a function of a fixed size bay, where a bay definesat least a floor portion of the building. Accordingly, the footprint ofeach building is established by a set of adjoining fixed size bays. Inan embodiment, each fixed size bay is a 30′×30′ square. Although a30′×30′ square bay is described, other shapes and dimensions of a fixedsize bay are possible. Given 30′×30′ fixed size bays, the footprintshape of each story of a building is a function of the 30′×30′ bays andcan only be changed by 30′ increments.

Using fixed size bays, multiple different footprint shapes can beproduced. In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a limitednumber of footprint shapes have been predefined for use incharacterizing energy use. Each footprint shape is formed from the fixedsize bays and the footprint shapes can be selected in view of, forexample, known footprint shapes and/or commonly used architecturalparti. For example, the footprint shapes are footprint shapes that havepractical application to healthcare buildings. FIGS. 19 a-19 h depictnine different predefined footprint shapes, including footprint shape R(FIG. 19 a), footprint shape L (FIG. 19 b), footprint shape Z (FIG. 19c), footprint shape K (FIG. 19 d), footprint shape X (FIG. 19 e),footprint shape T (FIG. 19 f), footprint shape U (FIG. 19 g), footprintshape H (FIG. 19 h), and footprint shape O (FIG. 19 i). Although somefootprint shapes are shown, other footprint shapes are possible. Asshown in FIGS. 19 a-19 i, each footprint shape has been given a “shapename” for identification purposes. The set of shape names defines ashape alphabet, which is represented as: R, L, Z, K, X, T, U, H, O. Withreference to FIGS. 19 a-19 i, dimensions of the footprint shapes areidentified as Bx, By, W, and H, where:

-   -   Bx—bounding box dimension on the x-axis in number of bays;    -   By—bounding box dimension on the y-axis in number of bays;    -   W—void area width dimension in number of bays; and    -   H—void area height dimension in number of bays.        As used herein and shown in FIGS. 19 a-19 i, the bounding box        dimensions represent the dimensions of a box defined by the        maximum x-axis and y-axis dimensions, and the void area        dimensions W and H are specific to each footprint shape.

A technique for characterizing the energy use of multiple differentbuilding massing configurations is now described in terms of the fixedsize bay and the predefined set of footprint shapes. A first stepinvolves modeling the energy use of a reference building. In anembodiment, the building massing configuration of the reference buildingis defined as a square building that has a 2-bay×2-bay footprint andthree stories. FIG. 20 depicts the footprint shape 602 of the referencebuilding and the building massing configuration of the referencebuilding is defined as:

-   -   Bx=2;    -   By=2;    -   W=0;    -   H=0; and    -   Ns=3, where Ns is the number of stories.        Given a 30′×30′ fixed size bay, the reference building is a        60′×60′ square that is three stories high.

With the building massing configuration of the reference buildingdefined, the energy use of the reference building is calculated. Inaccordance with an embodiment of the invention, the energy use of thereference building is calculated on an energy use per annum, per squarefoot basis, which is referred to herein as the energy use index (EUI). Aprocess for calculating the energy use index, EUI, of the referencebuilding is described with reference to FIG. 21. The process uses theEnergyPlus simulation program to calculate the total energy use of thereference building per annum and then divides the total energy use bythe total square footage of the reference building to come up with anenergy use index for the reference building, EUI-RB.

With reference to FIG. 21, a modeling input 604 is generated for thereference building. The modeling input includes building massingconfiguration information and other information as required by theEnergyPlus program. For example, the modeling input may be presented inan EnergyPlus input file (IDF) that also defines the simulationparameters. A number of tools are available to create EnergyPlus inputfiles. These include, for example, Easy EnergyPlus, ECOTECT,EnergyPlugged, EP-GEO & EP-SYS, EP-QUICK, ESP-r, jEPlus, and EP-Launch.Other techniques may also be used to create EnergyPlus input files. Onetechnique for creating simulation input filed, e.g., EnergyPlus inputfiles, is described below.

Once the modeling input 604 is established, it is provided to anEnergyPlus simulator 606, which runs an EnergyPlus simulation todetermine the total energy use 608 of the reference building. Forexample, the total energy use is calculated on in a per annum basis andit may be in the range of 20-40 GWh/annum for a 250,000 square footbuilding that delivers healthcare services. The total energy use is thenprovided to an indexer 610 to calculate the energy use index of thereference building, EUI-RB, 612. The energy use index of the referencebuilding, EUI-RB, can be expressed as:

EUI-RB=total energy use per annum/gross square footage

The energy use index of the reference building is used as describedbelow to normalize the simulation results for multiple differentbuilding massing configurations.

As explained above with reference to FIGS. 19 a-19 i, energy use ischaracterized with respect to a predefined set of footprint shapes. Anext step in the process involves modeling the energy use of buildingsthat utilize each of the different pre-defined footprint shapes,referred to herein as shape-specific modeling. In accordance with anembodiment of the invention, the energy use of multiple differentbuilding massing configurations is simulated for each differentfootprint shape and the results are used to generate a normalized energyuse index, nEUI, for each different building massing configuration.

A process for generating normalized energy use indexes, nEUIs, forbuildings having the footprint shape R is described with reference toFIG. 22. A first step in the process involves establishing the modelinginput 620 for an EnergyPlus simulation. In an embodiment, the modelinginput includes a set of building massing configurations in which eachinstance of a configuration has a different combination of configurationparameters, e.g., Bx, By, and Ns, but the same footprint shape. Notethat for footprint shape R, the void area dimensions W and H are notrelevant (e.g., essentially W=0 and H=0) and as described above, thevalues of Bx and By represent increments of the 30′×30′ fixed size bay.As shown in FIG. 22, each different shape-specific building massingconfiguration has a unique identifier, e.g., R₁, R₂, . . . R_(n).

In an example, the number of different shape-specific building massingconfigurations (e.g., where a shape-specific building massingconfiguration is defined by a unique set of Bx, By, W, H, and Ns) thatare established as inputs is on the order of thousands, e.g.,1,000-5,000 per footprint shape. For example, the number of differentshape-specific building massing configurations is a function of therange of possible values for Bx, By, W, H, and Ns, where the range ofpossible values for Bx, By, W, H, and Ns is selected to reflect thepossible range of building massing configurations that are to beevaluated. The total number of different shape-specific building massingconfigurations can be expressed as:

Total number=Bx×By×W×H×Ns

Given these five degrees of variability, the number of differentshape-specific building massing configurations grows rapidly for eachfootprint shape. For example, with the following ranges set at; 1≦Bx≦7,1≦By≦6, 0≦W≦5, 0≦H≦6, 1≦Ns≦4, the total number of differentshape-specific building massing configurations for a particularfootprint shape is calculated as:

7×6×6×7×4=7,056

A technique for generating and managing building massing configurationsis described in more detail below. In an embodiment, sets of buildingmassing configurations are pre-generated for each footprint shape andstored in a building massing configuration library, or “massinglibrary.” For example, the massing library includes building massingconfigurations, also referred to as design patterns, architecturalpatterns, or architectural partis, as described with reference to FIG.13 and patterns element 252.

For each different building massing configuration, the modeling input620 includes the building massing configuration and other informationthat is required by the EnergyPlus simulator. For example, the modelinginput may be provided in an IDF file that defines the EnergyPlussimulation parameters. With the modeling input established and providedto the EnergyPlus simulator 606, EnergyPlus simulations are run for eachdifferent building massing configuration. The EnergyPlus simulations canbe run, for example, in series on a single processor machine, inparallel on a multiprocessor machine, or in parallel using HPHPcomputing resources as described above with reference to FIG. 2. In oneimplementation, it is estimated that it would take approximately 40 daysto run 900 different EnergyPlus simulations serially on a singleprocessor machine, approximately 2.5 days to run the same 900 EnergyPlussimulations in parallel on a 16 processor Linux server, andapproximately 8 hours to run the same 900 EnergyPlus simulations usingHPHP computing, e.g., using 50 dual-processor nodes of a cloud computingresource such as Amazon Web Services (AWS). As with the referencebuilding, the total energy use is calculated on, for example, a perannum basis and may be in the range of 1-2 GWh/annum. Referring again toFIG. 22, upon completion of an EnergyPlus simulation, the total energyuse 622 for each building massing configuration, e.g., R₁, is providedto the indexer 610 to calculate the corresponding energy use index,e.g., EUI-R₁, 624. The energy use index of the building massingconfiguration is then provided to a normalizer 626, which normalizes theenergy use index by dividing the shape-specific energy use index by theenergy use index of the reference building. The normalized energy useindex for the building massing configuration R₁ can be expressed as:

nEUI-R1=EUI-R1/EUI-RB

The operations of energy use simulation, indexing, and normalizing areperformed for each of the different shape-specific building massingconfigurations, e.g., R₁, R₂, . . . R_(n) to produce shape-specificnormalized energy use indexes nEUI-R₁, nEUI-R₂, . . . nEUI-R_(n), 628.The nEUI data is stored in a shape-specific database for furtherprocessing as described below.

The process described above is performed for each of the predefinedshapes shown in FIGS. 19 a-19 i. FIG. 23 illustrates an embodiment ofthe process for generating normalized energy use indexes for buildingshaving the footprint shape L. In the example of FIG. 23, the number ofdifferent L-shaped building massing configurations is on the order ofthousands, e.g., 1,000-5,000, as described above.

With reference to FIG. 23, for each different building massingconfiguration of the L-shaped footprint, the modeling input 630 includesthe building massing configuration and other information that isrequired by the EnergyPlus simulator. With the modeling inputestablished and provided to the EnergyPlus simulator 606, EnergyPlussimulations are run for each different building massing configuration tocalculate the total energy use 632 on, for example, a per annum basis.Upon completion of an EnergyPlus simulation, the total energy use foreach building massing configuration, e.g., L₁, is provided to theindexer 610 to calculate the corresponding energy use index, e.g.,EUI-L₁, 634. The energy use index of the building massing configurationis then provided to a normalizer 624, which normalizes the energy useindex by dividing the shape-specific energy use index by the energy useindex of the reference building. The operations of energy usesimulation, indexing, and normalizing are performed for each of thedifferent L-shape building massing configurations, e.g., L₁, L₂, . . .L_(n) to produce shape-specific normalized energy use indexes nEUI-L₁,nEUI-L₂, . . . nEUI-L_(n), 638. The nEUI data is stored in ashape-specific database for further processing as described below.

Once the process of generating normalized energy use indexes for eachfootprint shape (e.g., R, L, Z, K, X, T, U, H, O) is completed,shape-specific formulas are derived from the normalized energy use indexdata. In an embodiment, formulas are derived that define the normalizedenergy use index, nEUI, as a function of a limited set of variablesrelated to the building massing configuration. For example, the formulasdefine the shape-specific normalized energy use indexes, nEUI, as afunction of the parameters; Bx, By, W, H, Ns, and in some cases θ, whereθ is the angular orientation of the building, e.g., relative to magneticnorth.

FIG. 24 illustrates an embodiment of the normalized energy use indexderivation operation, which includes shape-specific nEUI databases 650,a normalized energy use index formula derivation engine 652, andshape-specific nEUI formula databases 654. In the embodiment of FIG. 24,the shape-specific nEUI databases 650 include a database for eachdifferent footprint shape and the shape-specific nEUI formula databases654 include a database for each different footprint shape. The nEUIformula derivation engine 652 includes a shape-specific nEUI formuladerivation engine 656, a nEUI base formula derivation engine 658, and ashape-specific correction factor derivation engine 660.

In a first operation, the shape-specific normalized energy use indexdata is used by the shape-specific nEUI formula derivation engine 656 toderive shape-specific formulas that best fit the corresponding data as afunction of a limited set of variables, e.g., Bx, By, W, L, Ns, and θ.In an embodiment, a formula to represent nEUI for each footprint shapemay be derived by: 1) plotting all of the nEUIs that were calculatedduring the shape-specific simulations, 2) observing trends (e.g., energydemand trends) with respect to each of the shape definition parameters(e.g., Bx, By, W, H, Ns, θ, and ratio of perimeter length to footprintarea), 3) finding a parameter (e.g., Bx, By, W, H, Ns, θ, and ratio ofperimeter length to footprint area) that primarily affects a generaltrend (e.g., an energy demand trend) of the plotted curve, 4) findingthe best formula as a function of the primary parameter to describe thegeneral trend (e.g., energy demand trends) by using polynomialcurve-fitting or by applying knowledge of curve patterns that can bedescribed with other means of mathematical functions, 5) findingsecondary, tertiary, and so on parameters (e.g., Bx, By, W, H, Ns, θ,and ratio of perimeter length to footprint area) that can be used toreduce variances of simulated values from the formula, and 6) adjustingformula using terms expressed with the secondary, tertiary, and so onparameters. In an embodiment, the formula derivation involvesidentifying key contributing factors (e.g., Bx, By, W, H, Ns, θ, andratio of perimeter length to footprint area) that effect the energydemand of a building massing configuration. The operation of theshape-specific nEUI formula derivation engine 656 is repeated for eachshape-specific database.

In a next operation, the nEUI base formula derivation engine 658 derivesa base formula, which is common to all of the footprint shapes, from thepreviously derived shape-specific formulas. In an embodiment, a nEUIbase formula, which is common to all of the footprint shapes, may bederived by: 1) finding the most common form of formula among all theformulas derived for each footprint shape, 2) determining a new patternof formula (base formula) that generally describes the nEUIs of allfootprint shapes, and 3) re-establishing formulas for each footprintshape using the base formula to describe nEUI trends of each footprintshape.

In a next operation, the shape-specific correction factor derivationengine 660 derives a correction factor for each footprint shape tocalibrate the base normalized energy use index formula. In anembodiment, the correction factor corrects for variations related to thenumber of stories of the buildings, the void area dimensions, and in atleast one case the orientation of the building in degrees, θ, relativeto, for example, true north.

The nEUI formulas for each footprint shape, which are expressed usingthe common base formula, may be further improved by: 1) plotting andcomparing a calculated nEUI curve with a simulated result curve, 2)finding parameters (e.g., Bx, By, W, H, Ns, θ, and ratio of perimeterlength to footprint area) that can make the calculated nEUI curve closerto the simulated result curve, and 3) introducing correction terms thatare functions of those parameters to reduce the error percentage towithin an acceptable range, e.g., within 5% of the actual values.

In an embodiment, each shape-specific formula for calculating thenormalized energy use index, nEUI, includes a base formula and acorrection factor and can be expressed generally as:

nEUI-shape=(base formula)+correction factor

The base formula and/or correction factor may include intermediaryfactors and or coefficients. Examples of intermediary factors include:

Bfp=total number of bays in the footprint;

Be=total number of bays along the exposed perimeter of the footprint;and

Rs=Be/Bfp.

Examples of shape-specific formulas that have been derived forcalculating the normalized energy use indexes, nEUIs, are provided inthe Appendix. The examples include formulas for single-storey,two-storey, and three-plus storey buildings having footprint shapes R,L, Z, K, X, T, U, H, and O. The Appendix also includes alternateformulas that have been derived for buildings having more than twostories.

The shape-specific formulas, including corresponding coefficients, forcalculating the normalized energy use indexes, nEUIs, are stored in theshape-specific nEUI formula databases 654 for use in the BuildingRealization Platform (BRP) as described below. It should be noted that,in an embodiment, the operations described with reference to FIGS. 19a-24 are preliminary operations that are performed in advance of the useof the building realization program in the BRP.

Use of the shape-specific formulas to characterize the energy use ofmultiple different building massing configurations early on in thebuilding design process is now described with reference to FIG. 25. Whenutilized within the Building Realization Platform (BRP) described abovewith reference to FIGS. 1-18, different building massing configurationsare provided to a massing configuration evaluator 670. In an embodiment,the different building massing configurations are provided to themassing configuration evaluator as a set of parameters that can bedefined as specific finite values or value ranges. For example the setof parameters may include:

-   -   1) a listing of the preferable footprint shapes;    -   2) a range of the total square footage of the building;    -   3) a range of the footprint bounding box area, Bx, By;    -   4) a range of the void area dimensions, H and W; and    -   5) a range of the number of stories, Ns.        The energy massing configuration evaluator uses the predefined        shape-specific formulas to calculate normalized energy use        indexes, nEUIs, for each building massing configuration and to        output the normalized energy use indexes as desired by the user.

As described herein, the magnitude of the calculated normalized energyuse indexes, nEUIs, is an indication of the energy efficiency of aparticular building massing configuration relative to the referencebuilding. Therefore, a relatively large nEUI indicates that theparticular building massing configuration is less energy efficient,e.g., a building with the massing configuration would require moreenergy to operate, and a relatively small nEUI indicates that theparticular building massing configuration is more energy efficient,e.g., a building with the massing configuration would require lessenergy to operate. Because the energy use indexes, nEUIs, are allnormalized to the same reference building, the normalized energy useindexes, nEUIs, can be compared to each other as a metric of therelative energy efficiency between different building massingconfigurations.

An example operation of the above-described technique for characterizingthe energy use of multiple different building massing configurations isnow described with reference to FIGS. 26-28. In the example application,the set of massing configuration parameters is as follows:

-   -   1) preferable footprint shapes: all (R, L, Z, K, X, T, U, H, O);    -   2) range of the building total square footage: ≦150,000;    -   3) range of footprint bounding box area: 1≦Bx≦7 and 1≦By≦6;    -   4) range of void area dimensions: W≦5 and H≦6; and    -   5) range of number of stories: 1≦Ns≦4.

Given the above set of building massing configuration parameters, themassing configuration evaluator 670 calculates normalized energy useindexes, nEUIs, for 24,693 different building massing configurations. Inan embodiment, all of the normalized energy use indexes, nEUIs, werecalculated in less than one minute using the predefined formulas. Thetime frame of minutes is orders of magnitude less than the days, weeks,or months that would be required to run a different EnergyPlussimulation for each one of the different building massingconfigurations.

FIG. 26 depicts an embodiment of a user interface that displays thenormalized energy use indexes, nEUIs, of 32 of the 24,693 differentbuilding massing configurations. In particular, FIG. 26 depicts ascrollable window of building massing configurations 1-100 of 24,693(highlighted box 672), in which the building massing configurations allhave the footprint shape, R. Fields shown in FIG. 26 include:

-   -   id—a unique identification number of the building massing        configuration;    -   name—the shape name and a shape-specific reference number;    -   type—identification letter of the footprint shape;    -   x—bounding box dimension on the x-axis in feet;    -   y—bounding box dimension on the y-axis in feet;    -   z—height of the building in feet;    -   Bx—bounding box dimension on the x-axis in number of bays;    -   By—bounding box dimension on the y-axis in number of bays;    -   W—void area width dimension in number of bays;    -   H—void area height dimension in number of bays;    -   Nstory—number of stories;    -   Area—total area of the building massing configuration in square        feet; and    -   EUIn—normalized energy use index.

The massing configuration evaluator is configured to allow the set ofnormalized energy use indexes, e.g., all 24,693 nEUIs, to be searched,sorted, and/or manipulated in various ways to allow the data to bepresented in a manner that is useful to the user. For example, the usermay request a ranking of the 10 building massing configurations with thelowest normalized energy use index.

FIG. 27 depicts an embodiment of the user interface of FIG. 26 in whicha search menu 674 is overlaid on the data from FIG. 26. In the exampleof FIG. 27, the search menu includes fields that match the columns ofthe data in FIG. 26, and the search menu is populated with four searchparameters. In particular, the four search parameters are indicated inhighlighted boxes 676 and 678:

-   -   Bx: >4;    -   By: >4;    -   Ns: ≧3; and    -   Area: 12,000≦area≦14,000.

FIG. 28 depicts an embodiment of the user interface of FIG. 26 in whichthe displayed data is limited to building massing configurations thatmeet the criteria described with reference to FIG. 27. As illustrated inFIG. 28 (highlighted box 680), 403 of the original 24,693 differentbuilding massing configurations meet the search criteria and thebuilding massing configurations are ordered by nEUI.

Techniques for generating and managing building massing configurationsare now described with reference to FIGS. 29-37. In an embodiment, setsof building massing configurations are generated using a shape grammarapproach. With reference to FIG. 29, an initial set of building massingconfiguration primitives is generated from a base solid mass 702 and theapplication of at least one void object 704. The base solid is athree-dimensional rectangular mass having non-zero x, y, and z axisdimensions. A set of rectangular masses can be generated by varying thex, y, and z axis dimensions (e.g., parametrically in one bay incrementswhere a bay is a fixed size, e.g., 30′×30′, and in one floor incrementswhere a floor is a fixed size, e.g., 15′). Other building massingconfiguration primitives can be generated by applying a set of rules,referred to as a shape grammar, to the rectangular mass. In theembodiment of FIG. 29, the set of rules involves applying at least onethree-dimensional void object to the rectangular mass, in this case, arectangular void object although void object with other shapes arepossible. As shown in FIG. 29, multiple different void objects can beapplied to a rectangular mass. Using a parametric shape grammar, e.g.,varying the x and y dimensions by one bay and the z dimension by onefloor height, void objects are applied to a rectangular mass to form aset of building massing primitives. For example, one, two, three, orfour voids can be applied to a mass to form different building massingconfigurations. In the embodiment of FIG. 29, the shape grammar isapplied in a manner that generates building massing configurations 706having the footprint shapes as described above with reference to FIGS.19 a-19 i. In particular, the building massing configuration shapeprimitives, which are referred to herein as “building letters” of a“building alphabet” include the shapes R (not shown), H, K, L, O, R, T,U, X, and Z. In an embodiment, applying values to the x, y, and zdimensions of the rectangular mass and to the void object(s) thatcorrespond to realistic building sizes can result in thousands ofdifferent building massing configurations, e.g., 20,000 to 30,000different building massing configurations.

Although a building alphabet with a particular set of footprint shapes(e.g., the “letters” of the alphabet) is described, other shapes may beincluded in the building alphabet and the shape geometry can be modifiedby changing the shape grammar.

Application of a set of rules in the shape grammar to a particularbuilding massing configuration can result in thousands of differentbuilding massing configurations for each building letter, e.g., eachfootprint shape. FIG. 30 depicts a graphical user interface (GUI) 710that graphically displays building massing configurations 712 for arectangle footprint shape. The graphical user interface of FIG. 30 helpsto illustrate the scale of the number of different building massingconfigurations that can be generated for a single footprint shape. Thegenerated set of building massing configurations can be stored in adatabase for fast and flexible access by the BRP. FIG. 31 depicts agraphical user interface 720 of entries in a building alphabet databasethat is generated using the shape grammar as described with reference toFIG. 29. As shown in FIG. 31, the building alphabet database includes24,693 different building massing configurations, with configurations1-33 being currently displayed. The information in the graphical userinterface is similar to that described above with reference to FIG. 26.

Given the extremely large number of different building massingconfigurations that can be generated, it is desirable to be able tomanipulate the database to reduce the set of building massingconfigurations to better suit a particular building project. In anembodiment, the building alphabet database is searchable by any of thecolumn fields. For example, a search can be run to find only thoseshapes that will fit on a particular building site having specific x andy dimensions. Such a search, or “pre-filtering,” can be performed byspecifying the limits of the bounding box dimensions, Bx and By. Othercriteria (e.g., area, volume, aspect ratio, nEUI) can be used topre-filter the building massing configurations. FIG. 32 depicts agraphical user interface 724 that includes a search window 726 thatallows certain parameters of a search to be specified. For example, thesearch window allows any of the column parameters of a building massingdatabase to be specified and searched according to the specification. Inthe example of FIG. 32, the search criteria specifies alphabet letters“L” and “O”, area between 100,000 and 150,000 sq. ft., and having annEUI of less than 0.6. In an embodiment, a pre-filtered set of buildingmassing configurations is used to populate a building massing libraryfor a specific building project. In other embodiments, the buildingmassing library can be unfiltered such that the entire set of generatedbuilding massing configurations is available for evaluation in thecontext of the building design.

While the building alphabet provides a certain set of building massingconfigurations, a more complex set of building massing configurationscan be generated by combining different primitives, e.g., buildingletters from the building alphabet. FIG. 33 illustrates the applicationof shape grammar to the building alphabet to form more complex buildingmassing configurations 730, referred to herein as “building words.” Asillustrated across the top row of FIG. 33, applying a rule of “H+L”results in the building word depicted in the upper right corner of FIG.32. Rows 2-5 of FIG. 33 illustrate other rules in the shape grammar,e.g., “H+L+R,” “H+R,” “H+T,” and “H+U.” In an embodiment, the shapegrammar is parametrically applied to form multiple building massingconfigurations of the same building word. In an embodiment, the shapegrammar is applied to a pre-filtered set of building alphabet elements.For example, a pre-filtered set of “H” building elements may include 10different building massing configurations and a pre-filtered set of “L”building elements may include 20 different building massingconfigurations. The total number of possible building words is theproduct of the “H” and “L” building elements, e.g., 10×20=200. That is,200 different configurations of the “HL” (H+L) building word aregenerated from the building letters.

In an embodiment, the shape grammar is configured to require certaindimensions of two different building shapes to match, or to be within acertain range of each other. For example, with reference to the “HL”building word, the shape grammar may require that a particular dimensionor dimensions of the “H” and “L” elements match so that the differentstories of the building massing configuration have at least a portion oftheir respective footprints that are in common. The shape grammar may bemodified, updated, etc., as desired to trigger the generation ofdifferent building massing configurations.

FIG. 34 depicts a graphical user interface 736 that graphically displaysbuilding words 730 that are formed by combining different primitives(i.e., letters) of the building alphabet. For example, FIG. 34 depictsbuilding words that include a “U” primitive stacked on top of an “R”primitive, a “T” primitive stacked on top of an “R” primitive, and a “Z”primitive stacked on top of an “R” primitive. In the example of FIG. 34,the x and y dimensions of the R primitives are fixed and the U, T, and Zprimitives are applied to the R primitive in different dimensions, e.g.,parametrically varied dimensions.

As described above with reference to the building alphabet, generatedbuilding massing configurations in the building word form can also bestored in a database. FIG. 35 depicts a graphical user interface 740 ofdifferent building massing configurations that are formed by acombination of the building letters. As shown in FIG. 35, the databaseincludes 139 different building massing configurations having aparticular combination of building letters, of which building massingconfigurations 1-35 are displayed. Building massing configurations 1-35include “RU” (R+U) building words and “RT” (R+T) building words. Thegraphical user interface includes an id column, a name column, analphabet column, an area column, and an EUI column. The id columnassociates the building word with a unique identifier, the name columnassociates the building word with a unique building name, the alphabetcolumn indicates which primitives from the building alphabet were usedto form the building word, the area column is the total area in terms offloor space of the building word (e.g., assuming each letter representsa different floor), and the word EUI represents the combined normalizedEUI, nEUI, of the building word, where the word EUI is calculated on aproportional basis, e.g., relative to footprint area using the nEUIsfrom the corresponding building primitives. For example, the nEUI forbuilding word id=1 is calculated as:area(R−168)·nEUI(R−168)/225,000+area(U−208)·nEUI(U−208)/225,000.

As described above, building massing configurations can be generated andreferred to as building letters of a building alphabet or buildingwords. In each case, a particular building massing configuration is onecontiguous mass, e.g., a single contiguous building. In anotherembodiment, a shape grammar can be applied to the building alphabetand/or to building words to generate multi-building configurations inwhich the buildings are not physically connected to each other. Keepingwith the “building alphabet” and “building word” taxonomy, multiplebuilding massing configurations can be associated with each other toform a “building sentence.” In an embodiment, the association ofmultiple buildings into a building sentence is a physical association ornearness. However, the association of multiple buildings into a buildingsentence may be a functional association instead of, or in addition to,the physical association. A building sentence is applicable to amulti-building complex such as a healthcare services complex. FIG. 36illustrates the application of shape grammar to a set of building words730 to generate building sentences 744, e.g., HL+HL. As illustratedacross the top row of FIG. 36, two HL (H+L) building words areassociated with each other to form a building sentence. In theembodiment of FIG. 36, the two HL building words (HL+HL) are associatedwith each other in that the buildings are understood to be locatedtogether at the same physical site at a known spacing and in theorientation as shown. Building sentences can also be generated from abuilding letter and a building word or from a building letter andanother building letter, e.g., R+U.

FIG. 37 depicts an embodiment of a system 3702 for implementing thebuilding massing configuration generation and management techniques asdescribed above. The system of FIG. 37 includes a shape grammar database3704, a building massing library 3706 that includes a building alphabetdatabase 3708, a building word database 3710, and a building sentencedatabase 3712, a building massing generation engine 3714, and a queryengine 3716. The shape grammar database includes rules for generatingthe building alphabet, the building words, and/or the buildingsentences. The building alphabet database stores a set or sets ofbuilding letters, or primitives, as described, for example withreference to FIGS. 29 and 30. The building word database stores a set,or sets, of building words as described for example with reference toFIGS. 33 and 34. The building sentence database stores a set, or sets,of building sentences as described, for example, with reference to FIG.36. The building mass generation engine applies the appropriate shapegrammar, e.g., mass generation rules, to the appropriate shape databaseto form additional building massing configurations. The query engineenables the various shape databases to be searched and managed togenerate a set of building massing configurations that may be desirablefor evaluation in a particular building project. For example, the queryengine enables the building massing library to be searched according toa parameter, or set of parameters, to reduce the set of differentbuilding massing configurations to set of building massingconfigurations that is a subset of the original set. For example, thebuilding massing library is searched to find only those building massingconfigurations that meet certain project requirements, e.g., boundingbox size, total square footage, number of floors, architectural parti,and/or energy efficiency. The reduced set of building massingconfigurations is then used to evaluate an aspect of a building design.

In an embodiment, the building massing generation system is a componentof the Building Realization Program (BRP), which is implemented througha combination of software and hardware, such as computer executableinstructions stored in memory and executed by the computer 500 of FIG.18. In an embodiment, the generated building massing configurations arestored in the building massing library and can be used to support otherfunctions in the Building Realization Program (BRP). For example, thebuilding massing configurations in the building massing library can beused for energy analysis (as described in detail above), structuralsizing (e.g., ETABS), structural detailing (e.g., Telka), block andstack, and façade generation.

In the above description, specific details of various embodiments areprovided. However, some embodiments may be practiced with less than allof these specific details. In other instances, certain methods,procedures, components, structures, and/or functions are described in nomore detail than to enable the various embodiments of the invention, forthe sake of brevity and clarity.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described andillustrated, the invention is not to be limited to the specific forms orarrangements of parts so described and illustrated. The scope of theinvention is to be defined by the claims appended hereto and theirequivalents.

In the above description, specific details of various embodiments areprovided. However, some embodiments may be practiced with less than allof these specific details. In other instances, certain methods,procedures, components, structures, and/or functions are described in nomore detail than to enable the various embodiments of the invention, forthe sake of brevity and clarity.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described andillustrated, the invention is not to be limited to the specific forms orarrangements of parts so described and illustrated. The scope of theinvention is to be defined by the claims appended hereto and theirequivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer based method for characterizing theenergy use of multiple different building massing configurations, themethod comprising: specifying a set of parameters for a building massingconfiguration; calculating a normalized energy use index for multipledifferent building massing configurations that meet the specified set ofparameters, wherein the normalized energy use index for each of themultiple different building massing configurations is normalized againsta reference energy use index of a reference building; ranking themultiple different building massing configurations by the respectivenormalized energy use indexes; and selecting at least one of thedifferent massing configurations for display on a graphical userinterface according to the ranking.
 2. The computer based method ofclaim 1 wherein the set of parameters for a building massingconfiguration includes at least one footprint shape, a range offootprint bounding box size on the x-axis, a range of footprint boundingbox size on the y-axis, and a range of number of stories of thebuilding.
 3. The computer based method of claim 1, wherein thenormalized energy use indexes for multiple different building massingconfigurations that meet the specified set of parameters are calculatedfrom pre-derived shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas. 4.The computer based method of claim 3, wherein the pre-derivedshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas are a function ofBx, By, W, H, and Ns.
 5. The computer based method of claim 4, whereinBx, By, W, and H are a function of a fixed size bay.
 6. The computerbased method of claim 3, wherein the pre-derived shape-specificnormalized energy use index formulas are derived by: establishing areference energy use index for a reference building; establishing a setof configuration parameters to define multiple different buildingmassing configurations, at least one of the configuration parametersdefining a building footprint shape; running an energy simulation forthe multiple different building massing configurations that meet the setof configuration parameters to produce energy use indexes for themultiple different building massing configurations; normalizing theenergy use indexes against the reference energy use index; derivingshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas from the normalizedenergy use indexes.
 7. The computer based method of claim 6, whereinderiving the shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas fromthe normalized energy use indexes comprises deriving a base formula anda correction factor for each different building footprint shape.
 8. Thecomputer based method of claim 6, wherein running an energy simulationcomprises running an EnergyPlus simulation.
 9. The computer based methodof claim 6, wherein the set of configuration parameters includes Bx, By,W, H, and Ns.
 10. The computer based method of claim 3, wherein at leastone of the shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas is afunction of Rs, wherein Rs=Be/Bfp, where Bfp is the number of bays inthe footprint of a particular building massing configuration, Be is thenumber of bays along the exposed perimeter of the particular buildingmassing configuration, and each bay is the same size.
 11. The computerbased method of claim 1, wherein the different building massingconfigurations have a footprint shape that is selected from the groupconsisting of a rectangular footprint shape, an L footprint shape, a Zfootprint shape, a K footprint shape, an X footprint shape, a Tfootprint shape, a U footprint shape, an H footprint shape, and an Ofootprint shape.
 12. The computer based method of claim 1, wherein thedifferent building massing configurations and the reference building aredefined as a function of a fixed bay size.
 13. The computer based methodof claim 12, wherein the fixed bay size has a rectangular footprintshape and dimensions of 30 feet by 30 feet.
 14. The computer basedmethod of claim 1, wherein the different building massing configurationsare generated using a shape grammar and are stored in a building massinglibrary.
 15. The computer based method of claim 1, wherein selecting atleast one of the different massing configurations for display on agraphical user interface according to the normalized energy use indexescomprises selecting a building massing configuration having a normalizedenergy use index that indicates low energy use relative to others of thebuilding massing configurations for which a normalized energy use indexwas calculated.
 16. The computer based method of claim 1 furthercomprising using the selected building massing configuration for furtherprocessing in a building realization system.
 17. A computer based methodfor characterizing the energy use of multiple different building massingconfigurations, the method comprising: establishing a reference energyuse index for a reference building; deriving a normalized energy useindex formula for each of multiple different building footprint shapesusing the reference energy use index; and calculating normalized energyuse indexes for multiple different building massing configurations usingthe shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas; ranking themultiple different building massing configurations according to thenormalized energy use indexes.
 18. The computer based method of claim17, wherein the shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas area function of Bx, By, W, H, and Ns.
 19. The computer based method ofclaim 17 wherein deriving the shape-specific normalized energy use indexformulas comprises: establishing a set of configuration parameters, atleast one of the configuration parameters defining a building footprintshape; running an energy simulation for multiple different buildingmassing configurations that meet the set of configuration parameters toproduce energy use indexes for the multiple different building massingconfigurations; calculating a normalized energy use index for eachdifferent massing configuration from the energy use indexes for themultiple different building massing configurations and from thereference energy use index; and deriving the shape-specific normalizedenergy use index formulas from the normalized energy use indexes. 20.The computer based method of claim 19, wherein deriving theshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas from the normalizedenergy use indexes comprises deriving a base formula and a correctionfactor for each different building footprint shape.
 21. The computerbased method of claim 19, wherein running an energy simulation comprisesrunning an EnergyPlus simulation.
 22. The computer based method of claim19, wherein the set of configuration parameters includes Bx, By, W, H,and Ns.
 23. The computer based method of claim 17, wherein theshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas are a function ofBx, By, W, H, and Ns.
 24. The computer based method of claim 17 whereinestablishing a reference energy use index comprises running an energysimulation based on building massing configuration parameters of thereference building to generate the reference energy use index.
 25. Thecomputer based method of claim 17 wherein at least 2000 differentbuilding massing configurations, which meet the established set ofconfiguration parameters, are defined and wherein a separate energysimulation is run for each of the different building massingconfigurations.
 26. A computer based method for realizing a buildingsystem, the method comprising: receiving input related to customer needsfor a building system, the input being received through a user interfaceat a remote client device and being expressed in a formal descriptionlanguage; generating multiple different business models from thecustomer needs input, wherein the business models define, in afunctional language, types and volumes of services that will be providedwithin the building system to satisfy the customer needs; generatingmultiple different spatial arrangements from at least one of thebusiness models, wherein the spatial arrangements define a form andshell of the building system, a block and stack of the building system,and room locations within the building system; generating multipledifferent systems integration designs from at least one of the spatialarrangements, wherein the systems integration designs define threedimensional spaces of infrastructure of the building system; trackingdependencies between the customer needs, the business models, thespatial arrangements, and the systems integration designs; whereingenerating multiple different spatial arrangements comprises:identifying, from at least one of the business models, a set ofparameters for a building form and shell, the set of parameters definingmultiple different building massing configurations; calculating, usingpre-defined normalized energy use index formulas, a normalized energyuse index for the multiple different building massing configurations,wherein the normalized energy use index for each of the multipledifferent building massing configurations is normalized against areference energy use index of a reference building; ranking the multipledifferent building massing configurations by the respective normalizedenergy use indexes; and selecting at least one of the different buildingmassing configurations for display on a graphical user interfaceaccording to the ranking.
 27. The computer based method of claim 26further comprising using the selected building massing configuration isthe step of generating multiple different systems integration designs.28. A non-transitory computer readable medium that stores computerreadable instructions, which when executed by at least one processor,implement a method comprising: specifying a set of parameters for abuilding massing configuration; calculating a normalized energy useindex for multiple different building massing configurations that meetthe specified set of parameters, wherein the normalized energy use indexfor each of the multiple different building massing configurations isnormalized against a reference energy use index of a reference building;ranking the multiple different building massing configurations by therespective normalized energy use indexes; and selecting at least one ofthe different massing configurations for display on a graphical userinterface according to the ranking.
 29. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 28, further comprising computer readableinstructions, which when executed by the at least one processor,implements a method wherein the set of parameters for a building massingconfiguration includes at least one footprint shape, a range offootprint bounding box size on the x-axis, a range of footprint boundingbox size on the y-axis, and a range of number of stories of thebuilding.
 30. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 28,further comprising computer readable instructions, which when executedby the at least one processor, implements a method wherein thenormalized energy use indexes for multiple different building massingconfigurations that meet the specified set of parameters are calculatedfrom pre-derived shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas.31. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 30, furthercomprising computer readable instructions, which when executed by the atleast one processor, implements a method wherein the pre-derivedshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas are a function ofBx, By, W, H, and Ns.
 32. The non-transitory computer readable medium ofclaim 28, further comprising computer readable instructions, which whenexecuted by the at least one processor, implements a method wherein thepre-derived shape-specific normalized energy use index formulas arederived by: establishing a reference energy use index for a referencebuilding; establishing a set of configuration parameters to definemultiple different building massing configurations, at least one of theconfiguration parameters defining a building footprint shape; running anenergy simulation for the multiple different building massingconfigurations that meet the set of configuration parameters to produceenergy use indexes for the multiple different building massingconfigurations; normalizing the energy use indexes against the referenceenergy use index; deriving shape-specific normalized energy use indexformulas from the normalized energy use indexes.
 33. A computer basedmethod for deriving energy use index formulas for different buildingmassing configuration, the method comprising: establishing a referenceenergy use index by running an energy simulation based on buildingmassing configuration parameters of a reference building; establishing aset of configuration parameters for each of multiple different buildingfootprint shapes; running an energy simulation for each of multipledifferent building massing configurations that meet the set ofconfiguration parameters to produce energy use indexes for the multipledifferent building massing configurations; calculating a normalizedenergy use index for each different massing configuration from theenergy use indexes for the multiple different building massingconfigurations and from the reference energy use index; and derivingshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas for each of themultiple different building footprint shapes from the normalized energyuse indexes.
 34. The computer based method of claim 33, wherein theshape-specific normalized energy use index formulas are a function ofBx, By, W, H, and Ns.
 35. The computer based method of claim 34, whereinderiving the shape-specific normalized energy use index formulascomprises deriving a base formula and a correction factor for eachdifferent building footprint shape.
 36. The computer based method ofclaim 35, wherein running an energy simulation comprises running anEnergyPlus simulation.
 37. The computer based method of claim 36,wherein the set of configuration parameters includes Bx, By, W, H, andNs.
 38. The computer based method of claim 33, wherein establishing aset of configuration parameters for each of multiple different buildingfootprint shapes comprises applying a shape grammar to form at least oneof building letters and building words, and further comprising storingthe multiple different building massing configuration in a buildingmassing library.